|
1000 or 1024?
|
| Author |
Message |
MiretanK
Spaministrator
      
Posts: 1,264
Group: Administrators
Joined: Mar 2006
Status:
Offline
|
1000 or 1024?
Today I have a Hardware test in my web designer course. Nope, we'll not burn computers today Though we'll have to calculate between GB and KB.
My question here is, when you convert these values without a good calc, which value do you use? 1024 or 1000? 1000 makes the thing a lot easier, but my teacher son of a whore will give only half point if we calculate using 1000. :\

dA Page|flickr|Joejoe.org
CPU: Intel Core 2® Quad Q6600@2.4GHz RAM: 2GB Dual Channel, 1GB PC2-5300 667MHz Kingston Mainboard: Asus P5K DELUXE/WiFi-AP Video Card: Solar GeForce 8600GT 256MB DDR3 Storage: 80GB WDC SATA/ 40GB ST3 SCSI/ 80GB Samsung USB HDD PSU: WiseCase 500W Monitor: LG 710E
|
|
| 09-15-2006 08:39 AM |
|
 |
RealOne
do i look like i care :P
      
Posts: 1,075
Group: Administrators
Joined: Mar 2006
Status:
Away
|
RE: 1000 or 1024?
1000 Would Be easier, but 1024 would give you the exact Value
1024 bytes = 1 KB
1000 KB = 1 MB
1000 MB = 1 GB
So, 1 GB = 1024000000 Bytes.. (not sure )
I recommend that you use the exact value if, the teacher would reduce your mark

PCSX2 0.9.4 Beta | My Space | NGemu | PCSX2 | Gekko Emu
|
|
| 09-15-2006 10:15 AM |
|
 |
cliffy2000
Trout Mask Original
  
Posts: 138
Group: Beta Discussion Members
Joined: Sep 2006
Status:
Offline
|
RE: 1000 or 1024?
1000 Would Be easier, but 1024 would give you the exact Value
1024 bytes = 1 KB
1000 KB = 1 MB
1000 MB = 1 GB
So, 1 GB = 1024000000 Bytes.. (not sure  )
I recommend that you use the exact value if, the teacher would reduce your mark 
Actually, they are all multiples of 1024 (or, actually, 2^10). It's actually pretty easy to do your computations just by multiplying by 2 10 times for each conversion. (Doubling numbers without a calculator isn't hard at all, just keep a tally for each iteration.)
So, in terms of bytes:
1 KB = 1024 (2^10) bytes
1 MB = 1024 (2^10) KB = 1048576 (2^20) bytes
1 GB = 1024 (2^10) MB = 1048576 (2^20) KB = 1073741824 (2^30) bytes
I believe what RealOne is referring to is the new term (used by sneaky harddrive manufacturers) of MiB and GiB, which multiply by 10 for the previous iteration. There's some ambiguity in the terms, but as a general rule of thumb, just use the power of 2 convention unless otherwise explicitly stated.
|
|
| 09-15-2006 10:27 AM |
|
 |
RealOne
do i look like i care :P
      
Posts: 1,075
Group: Administrators
Joined: Mar 2006
Status:
Away
|
|
| 09-15-2006 10:47 AM |
|
 |
MiretanK
Spaministrator
      
Posts: 1,264
Group: Administrators
Joined: Mar 2006
Status:
Offline
|
RE: 1000 or 1024?
I am too lazy to multiply by 1024. :/

dA Page|flickr|Joejoe.org
CPU: Intel Core 2® Quad Q6600@2.4GHz RAM: 2GB Dual Channel, 1GB PC2-5300 667MHz Kingston Mainboard: Asus P5K DELUXE/WiFi-AP Video Card: Solar GeForce 8600GT 256MB DDR3 Storage: 80GB WDC SATA/ 40GB ST3 SCSI/ 80GB Samsung USB HDD PSU: WiseCase 500W Monitor: LG 710E
|
|
| 09-15-2006 05:44 PM |
|
 |
General Plot
Britchie Crazy
      
Posts: 2,305
Group: Administrator/Developer
Joined: Mar 2006
Status:
Offline
|
RE: 1000 or 1024?
Since I pretty much know most common conversions off the top of my head, I stay with 1024.

Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 | 2 GB DDR2 RAM | GeForce 7900 GTX
2.5 TB Hard Drive Space | Windows XP Pro SP2
Check out my site: http://generalplot.atspace.com
Official betatester of PCSX2 and Co-owner of General Emulation
|
|
| 09-15-2006 07:29 PM |
|
 |
MiretanK
Spaministrator
      
Posts: 1,264
Group: Administrators
Joined: Mar 2006
Status:
Offline
|
RE: 1000 or 1024?
:X
I would agree with 1024 if I had a calculator that supports more than 8 digits. I want to see you calculating by hand 5,3 * 1024^2

dA Page|flickr|Joejoe.org
CPU: Intel Core 2® Quad Q6600@2.4GHz RAM: 2GB Dual Channel, 1GB PC2-5300 667MHz Kingston Mainboard: Asus P5K DELUXE/WiFi-AP Video Card: Solar GeForce 8600GT 256MB DDR3 Storage: 80GB WDC SATA/ 40GB ST3 SCSI/ 80GB Samsung USB HDD PSU: WiseCase 500W Monitor: LG 710E
|
|
| 09-15-2006 09:16 PM |
|
 |
Celine
Aensland Tanar'ri
      
Posts: 219
Group: Administrators
Joined: Mar 2006
Status:
Offline
|
|
| 09-15-2006 09:17 PM |
|
 |
General Plot
Britchie Crazy
      
Posts: 2,305
Group: Administrator/Developer
Joined: Mar 2006
Status:
Offline
|
RE: 1000 or 1024?
:X
I would agree with 1024 if I had a calculator that supports more than 8 digits.  I want to see you calculating by hand 5,3 * 1024^2 
Simple. Say it's 20 gig, so 1024x1024=1048576x1024=1073741824 kb per gig, so, 1073741824x20=21474836480 kb for 20 gigs.

Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 | 2 GB DDR2 RAM | GeForce 7900 GTX
2.5 TB Hard Drive Space | Windows XP Pro SP2
Check out my site: http://generalplot.atspace.com
Official betatester of PCSX2 and Co-owner of General Emulation
|
|
| 09-15-2006 10:03 PM |
|
 |
MiretanK
Spaministrator
      
Posts: 1,264
Group: Administrators
Joined: Mar 2006
Status:
Offline
|
RE: 1000 or 1024?
Simple. Say it's 20 gig, so 1024x1024=1048576x1024=1073741824 kb per gig, so, 1073741824x20=21474836480 kb for 20 gigs.
Ok, now close the windows calc 
I hate hard drive manufacturers for mixing both.
I hate my teacher by forcing us to calculate such painful numbers. :/

dA Page|flickr|Joejoe.org
CPU: Intel Core 2® Quad Q6600@2.4GHz RAM: 2GB Dual Channel, 1GB PC2-5300 667MHz Kingston Mainboard: Asus P5K DELUXE/WiFi-AP Video Card: Solar GeForce 8600GT 256MB DDR3 Storage: 80GB WDC SATA/ 40GB ST3 SCSI/ 80GB Samsung USB HDD PSU: WiseCase 500W Monitor: LG 710E
|
|
| 09-15-2006 10:11 PM |
|
 |
schattenberg
Administrator
      
Posts: 133
Group: Administrator/Developer
Joined: Mar 2006
Status:
Offline
|
RE: 1000 or 1024?
1024 all the way. Its more percise. I had a teacher that wanted us to use 1000 instead of 1024, and that just hurt me to know that they are 24 units off, but with a large degree of error. On a somewhat different note...I like base 8 and 16 better.

Intel Core Duo @ 1.86Ghz | 2 GB DDR2 RAM | 894 MB ATI Mobility Radeon x1400
80GB Hard Disk Drive | Windows Vista Ultimate
Co-owner of General Emulation
This post was last modified: 09-17-2006 03:10 AM by schattenberg.
|
|
| 09-16-2006 01:26 AM |
|
 |
Matt
Registered
Posts: 7
Group: Registered
Joined: Jul 2006
Status:
Offline
|
RE: 1000 or 1024?
Can't you just be lazy and write it as a power or 2?
|
|
| 09-16-2006 05:22 AM |
|
 |
Gilgamesh
Trusted Beta Discussion Member
  
Posts: 418
Group: Beta Discussion Members
Joined: Jul 2006
Status:
Offline
|
RE: 1000 or 1024?
i prefer 1024 
if use 1000 to calculate, it'll get only an approximate value
most of the HDD maker, use 1000 instead of 1024
so, when the HDD is become larger, a difference becomes more marked
eg. in 200 GB HDD, there doesn't have exact 214,748,364,800 bytes (200 GB)
there only have 200,000,000,000 bytes, because they use 1000 instead of 1024
so the HDD will have 186.26 GB only
there's lost of 6.87 percentage of every HDD that must have normally
PS: but i'm not sure about this
CPU: AMD Athlon 64 3500+ Mainboard: MSI K8N Neo4-F Graphic: MSI Geforce 8500 GT [upgraded] (256 MB) OS: Windows XP Media Center Edition
NGEMU forum 
WarCraft III Map - DotA
Guitar Forum
Game walkthroughs, saves, cheats 
Newbies! introduce yourself here | Horoscope | PCSX2 saves
|
|
| 09-16-2006 07:55 AM |
|
 |
MiretanK
Spaministrator
      
Posts: 1,264
Group: Administrators
Joined: Mar 2006
Status:
Offline
|
RE: 1000 or 1024?
ohgod didn't know you guys were sooo perfectionists

dA Page|flickr|Joejoe.org
CPU: Intel Core 2® Quad Q6600@2.4GHz RAM: 2GB Dual Channel, 1GB PC2-5300 667MHz Kingston Mainboard: Asus P5K DELUXE/WiFi-AP Video Card: Solar GeForce 8600GT 256MB DDR3 Storage: 80GB WDC SATA/ 40GB ST3 SCSI/ 80GB Samsung USB HDD PSU: WiseCase 500W Monitor: LG 710E
|
|
| 09-16-2006 09:34 AM |
|
 |
cliffy2000
Trout Mask Original
  
Posts: 138
Group: Beta Discussion Members
Joined: Sep 2006
Status:
Offline
|
RE: 1000 or 1024?
You're (kinda) right, Gilgamesh. To be absolutely accurate, KiB, MiB, GiB and TiB should be used for for 1024^n and KB, MB, GB and TB should be used for 1000^n. It really makes things more simple. The whole system suffers from a confused nomenclature and really should rely solely on binary prefixes. Then again, this would hurt the HDD manufacturers' bottom line, so, well, I wouldn't count on it.
|
|
| 09-16-2006 11:09 AM |
|
 |
|
|